Serengeti logo BLACK white bg w slogan

Navigating the App Development Landscape - No-Code, Low-Code, and Full-Code


Application development has surged in the previous 10 years, and businesses have realized that it cannot take forever to bring a unique app into the market. Market dynamics and competitive advantage vary on a daily basis, and here is where a quicker, leaner, and more time-efficient development cycle may make a huge impact.

Operational inefficiencies and bloated app development procedures cannot continue to hold back your ambition. If typical full-code practices do not yield ideal results, brands want to use more feasible methods such as low-code and no-code to launch the app. But how can you determine which strategy is right for you? That is exactly what we will investigate in this blog post.

A quick overview

image 14

For software development, the companies usually relied on two methods. The first is to hire qualified developers, while the second is to use off-the-shelf solutions.

However, a third option has evolved in the shape of no/low code development platforms. All these innovative solutions provide companies without in-house software development experts a personalised solution. Furthermore, by delivering cost-effective tailored software solutions, these techniques boost the company's flexibility and efficiency.

The full-code method gives the flexibility required for a large-scale project. Furthermore, it allows for significant customization to meet any project requirements.

Overall, when implementing a software development plan, it is critical to evaluate no-code versus low-code vs full-code.

What the numbers say

The global low-code/no-code development platform industry is estimated to generate $187 billion in sales by 2030. By 2024, it will account for a little over 65% of all application development activity.

Almost 60% of all custom applications is developed outside of the IT department. Employees with low or no knowledge of technical development developed 30% of those.

31% of companies that employ low-code/no-code haven't used it to create or deliver any of their most valuable apps.

More than 60% of companies indicated that using low-code increases revenue and helps replace legacy systems.

The mixture of low-code/no-code and conventional innovation is projected to be adopted by 75% of companies.

4 out of 5 businesses in the USA use low-code solutions. 

Unpacking the Risks and Benefits of No-Code, Low-Code, and Full-Code App Development


image 15

Developers construct and deploy programs through full-code assembly, particularly beneficial when code intricately ties to the user experience. Developers commonly utilize JavaScript frameworks like React or Angular, along with frameworks specifically designed for mobile or native applications.

This approach is well-suited for a "code-driven" experience closely aligned with code deployment cycles. While content and data can be managed and updated externally, developers maintain full control over the actual interface and experience.

Dependency on developer resources is prominent in a full-code approach alone. When developers handle all aspects, it can potentially divert time from more critical tasks. Conversely, employing skilled developers enables companies to craft unique applications. Additionally, full-code platforms offer developers a diverse array of libraries, frameworks, and tools for app creation, preserving developer freedom and creativity—unlike the constraints seen in no-code and low-code approaches.

Full-code: Benefits and drawbacks

The fundamental advantage of full-code is the ability to design entirely customised business applications that are unique to your company. There are some other benefits, such as:

  • Allow developers to utilise any programming language and offer them complete control over the application's customisation.
  • It is the greatest solution for creating complicated applications since it allows for smooth connection with other systems, APIs, and databases.
  • It gives more freedom when creating and implementing unique features.
  • Allows thorough testing and debugging.

This approach demands an extended development timeline due to the necessity of constructing intricate functionalities. It involves the incorporation of custom code and third-party integrations, contributing to the overall overhead in terms of app maintenance. Proficient developers with advanced coding skills are essential for its execution, potentially leading to higher development costs.


image 16

To design apps with little coding, the low code development technique employs visual interfaces and drag-and-drop components.

It also enables users with no prior coding skills to rapidly design, build, and launch an application. The low code platform includes pre-built templates, reusable components, and automation tools that enable users to create effective applications. It also shortens the development cycle by removing the requirement for conventional coding. Furthermore, it encourages developers to demonstrate their unique ideas even if they lack considerable technical experience.

Low-code: Benefits and drawbacks

  • Allows quick application development, allowing businesses to swiftly deploy applications to meet their demands.
  • Reduces the need for hand-coding and lets people with no coding experience to construct apps using drag-and-drop components.
  • It simplifies the development process, saving time and effort.
  • Reduces the requirement for considerable code resources, resulting in development time, labour, and maintenance cost reductions.
  • Allows companies to quickly develop and test concepts in order to produce products on time.

Although there are a lot of benefits, there are also some drawbacks regarding low-code approach.

Using pre-built components or templates in development can limit customization due to abstracted code, reducing detailed control. This abstraction may compromise security features compared to manually coded solutions. Additionally, in the case you don't work with experts, migrating such solutions to different platforms poses challenges, adding complexity to the transition process.


image 17

As the name says, no-code is a method of developing software that needs little, if any, programming expertise to create an application quickly. This enables line of business (LOB) personnel who have the required institutional knowledge and understand the business needs for an app but lack programming language experience to construct software applications such as a form or website, or to add functionality to an existing site or app.

No-code serves as a visual interface between the end users and the programming environment, enabling users to create and adjust the look and feel of software without touching the code itself.

No-Code: Benefits and drawbacks

  • Allows users to create programmes without knowing how to code.
  • Allows for quicker development and more accessibility to a broader variety of customers.
  • It provides pre-built templates and a drag-and-drop interface.
  • Development costs are reduced, because developers are not included in the process.
  • Allow companies to sell their products more quickly while remaining competitive.

No-code platforms, though user-friendly, have limitations for intricate scenarios, lacking advanced functionality and customization. Challenges include difficulties in transferring to other environments, potential data loss, and the platform's learning curve. Limited control over code and infrastructure further constrains adaptability to diverse needs.

If we sum up all the above information in one table, we get the following:

snimka zaslona 627 1

Unlike no-code and low-code development, which prioritize quick application creation by citizen developers, full-code necessitates coding from the ground up by experienced developers. While full-code takes more time, it is often the preferred choice for companies needing tailor-made applications aligned with their specific business processes. These situations typically demand a high level of security, flexibility, and scalability, making full-code development the common preference.

Evaluating Development Paths – No-Code, Low-Code, and Full-Code


No-code's visual design tools and drag-and-drop interface contribute to time savings in app development. In contrast, full-code development requires building from the ground up, resulting in a lengthier process. Low-code strikes a balance between the two, requiring less time than full-code but more than no-code.

For expediting app development, no-code employs a what-you-see-is-what-you-get interface, facilitating faster completion due to its fully visual nature and the absence of code. Low-code encompasses these advantages but also allows script customization to enhance existing features. The intricate coding involved in full-code makes it challenging to reduce development time significantly.

Complex features

If you aim to incorporate intricate, business-specific functionalities into your application, opting for a no-code platform may not be the most suitable decision.

Low-code, however, offers an array of additional features, and its extensible nature enables you to build upon existing foundations. In conjunction with pre-built APIs, templates, and plug-in modules, developers can seamlessly innovate and introduce new capabilities. If the goal is to develop a robust custom application, low-code proves advantageous.

Conversely, with a full-code approach, integrating complex features poses no challenge. A team of proficient developers is at your disposal, addressing tasks ranging from interface refinement to addressing performance, security, and other considerations.


Complex modifications are possible with full-code, but not with no-code. The price of simplicity and faster development is that you must make the best of the templates that are accessible. Low code, being a middle ground between the two, allows for both. Full-code is best suited for highly personalised applications with an extensive number of features.

With no-code, your developers are limited in their ability to be creative with the application. Whereas full-code gives you an unlimited number of options, low-code does as well to some extent.


In contrast to no-code development, where reliance on third-party tools increases the risk of security vulnerabilities, full-code and low-code solutions offer distinct advantages.

Full-code and low-code approaches necessitate developer involvement, providing enhanced control to address regulatory challenges and security issues comprehensively. These solutions empower developers with insights into the code, enabling better oversight.

Unlike no-code, which may overlook security updates, full-code practices allow developers to exercise control over testing, performance, and overall quality, ensuring strict adherence to security protocols. Opting for a full-code approach, supported by a skilled development team, offers unparalleled peace of mind by minimizing the risk of security liabilities associated with no-code solutions.


In conclusion, the landscape of application development has evolved, offering businesses a spectrum of choices from full-code to low-code and no-code development paths. Each approach carries its own benefits, referring to diverse needs and priorities within the development lifecycle.

Low-code development emerges as a particularly compelling option, offering a balanced blend of customization, efficiency, and accessibility. It empowers both developers and citizen developers to design, build, and deploy applications without the extensive coding requirements of full-code development.

One of the primary benefits of low-code development lies in its ability to accelerate time-to-market without sacrificing the quality of the application. By streamlining the development process, low-code platforms enable businesses to respond promptly to market dynamics and gain a competitive edge.

The benefits of low-code development go beyond just efficiency and convenience; they encompass an approach to application development that aligns with the dynamic needs of modern businesses. By embracing low-code development practices, companies can unlock new opportunities for growth, innovation, and differentiation in an increasingly competitive marketplace.

Find out more about the benefits of low-code platforms in our whitepaper.

Arbeiten wir zusammen

Das Projekt wurde von der Europäischen Union aus dem Europäischen Fonds für regionale Entwicklung kofinanziert. Für den Inhalt der Website ist allein Serengeti ltd verantwortlich.