The different models to pick a software development team
The first model is what most people are familiar with: you hire a team and try to develop them over time. Hopefully, the best developers stay for years. This is the most common approach, and drives loyalty and keeps knowledge in-house. All of those are good things. The problem with hiring is that it can be time-consuming, it can be expensive, it can be risky (bad hires), and if your business models or product road maps change, you might not have the right developers on your team anymore. Let’s say most of your projects were cloud-driven for years, and you have very strong cloud developers.
Awesome. But now the executive team wants to do more with machine learning and to get the best developers for those projects, you would need to rehire. Again: it can be time-consuming, costly, and risky. You can see projects fall behind.
So hiring a full-time team is the primary model many companies use, but there are other models -- and in the past 10 years, you’ve seen a huge increase in outsourcing software development. The reason that the software development outsourcing market has been able to grow is because the model serves companies well: it’s less risky, it’s often less expensive than a series of full-time hires, and you get a wide breadth of expertise among the developers you get to work with.
But even when selecting a software development outsourcing partner, there are a few different models to consider.
Some outsourcing companies will list all their available developers and show the CV of each developer -- i.e. what projects he/she has worked on, what companies in the past, all that. You can almost pick and choose different developers by their CV. It is like a sports draft in some ways!
Our model is a little bit different. We trust all of our developers to get projects done for clients, and we trust all of our developers working as an extension of your team, regardless of each developer's experience level. We choose developers per project very carefully.
You should know the answer to this question already, but for some, it’s not so simple. We are changing our relationship to expertise these days because knowledge is so free and available (think Google). It creates a situation where a lot of people can claim to be experts on a topic, or legitimately make themselves experts on a topic through learning channels, such as YouTube or coding courses online. How we think about the idea of “expertise” has changed, and some companies are getting swindled in that deal -- they are ending up with full-time hires and outsourced developers who are not really experts in a given field.
So if we are losing faith in expertise … that’s bad. We need to double down on expertise and get people on our teams that really have it. Mark Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, has said repeatedly that the difference between an “A-Player Dev” (top Dev) and even a “B-Player Dev” (good but not amazing) is millions of dollars. And that’s true. Especially in highly-technical, fast-moving projects, expertise is a must.
But there is a final wrinkle
If you come across a company using the “select the CVs of the developers” model, what you are selecting for is individual expertise and background. You do not necessarily know how that developer -- the body that you selected -- will perform in the team. Most software development projects, sprints, Kanbans, and backlog management sessions are team-based. Having an A-Player Developer with Microsoft experience is awesome, but what if they cannot work on a team? Some call it “the brilliant jerk.”
So what you need is …
Excellent individual developers
Those same developers can work on a team together
Those same developers can work as an extension of your team
There is a great deal of domain expertise
They work as a consultative model, helping propose business solutions to you -- not just fixing code
If you hit these bullet points, you hit a sweet spot. You get big money, important projects done. You beat rivals.
If you want to know more about the process of selecting outsourced software development teams, we put together a checklist to help guide your process:
Das Projekt wurde von der Europäischen Union aus dem Europäischen Fonds für regionale Entwicklung kofinanziert. Für den Inhalt der Website ist allein Serengeti ltd verantwortlich.
Get a Quote
To get an accurate quote, please provide as many details as possible. One of our key account managers will contact you back with a custom quote for your project.
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff ist für den rechtmäßigen Zweck der Speicherung von Präferenzen erforderlich, die nicht vom Abonnenten oder Benutzer angefordert wurden.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.Die technische Speicherung oder der Zugriff, der ausschließlich zu anonymen statistischen Zwecken verwendet wird. Ohne eine Vorladung, die freiwillige Zustimmung deines Internetdienstanbieters oder zusätzliche Aufzeichnungen von Dritten können die zu diesem Zweck gespeicherten oder abgerufenen Informationen allein in der Regel nicht dazu verwendet werden, dich zu identifizieren.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.